commonly fail. Thus an institutionalized science is expected to withhold knowledge of the threat; a self-regulated press is expected to make light of any disaster; while an institutionalized religion is expected to oppose predestination and to secure such general belief in a
fundamentally benevolent deity as can be mustered."
The above comments are found in a letter (dated June 4, 1996) from the office of Dr. P. A. Charles, then Head of Astrophysics of the University of Oxford, to Ms. Victoria Cox, then Chief, Physics and BMD Coordinator of the European Office of Aerospace Research and Development. The letter (written by S V M Clube) summarizes the findings of USAF funded research resulting in the report, The Hazard to Civilization From Fireballs and Comets.
Although the report does not represent the electrical perspective on comets and/or meteoroids, it raises many issues of enormous import to the Electric Universe. As correctly pointed out by Clube, scientific, governmental, and religious officialdom seem to live in either
deliberate or unconscious denial of the real global threats posed to Earth - including evidence of global catastrophes in the recent past.
In 1950, Immanuel Velikovsky proposed in his book Worlds in Collision that in a once-violent and chaotic solar system, the earth experienced global disturbances, including electric arcs passing between the earth and cosmic intruders. Subsequently, academia applied such pressure to the book's publisher that it was dropped while it was the NY Times'
number one bestseller. This pathology of denial and suppression
continues today, as mainstream cosmology remains willfully ignorant of the Electric Universe - a model that rewrites much of human history into a story that is far more dramatic and frightening than we've been led to believe.
Paradoxically, officialdom's lobbyists continually promote fear of the End of the World in the hope of securing endless billions in funds for more research and "action." The "doomsday" asteroid threat and the
global warming madhouse are the favored causes of the moment. From the Electric Universe perspective, officialdom has misled the public on both issues, and required is immediate and fundamental correction.
When it comes to "killer asteroids," according to EU proponents, our planet may not be nearly so vulnerable as the mainstream insists. From the EU perspective, as explained by Wallace Thornhill, Earth, asteroids, and comets are charged bodies moving in the electric field of the Sun.
Thornhill believes that the charge difference between the earth and these bodies from the depths of the solar system provides the earth with a natural defense against asteroids and comets, particularly very large ones.
When an asteroid or comet enters the electric field of the Earth,
which is contained within its "magnetosophere," or more accurately, plasma sheath, there will be a powerful discharge between the two bodies.
The internal electrical stress caused by the discharge of the
interloping asteroid or comet will generally cause it to detonate like an exploding capacitor - just as comets have frequently exploded
"inexplicably" as they moved toward the Sun on their elongated orbits.
This electrical effect is also witnessed in bolides that flicker, flare up and explode as they streak toward the Earth. It is why meteors become visible to the eye when they are about 60 miles in altitude, and a few appear at up to twice that height.
And it is why meteors are sometimes
accompanied by electrophonic sound that is simultaneous with their
flaring up.
This is not to say that the Electric theorists believe comets and
asteroids pose no threat to human beings. But the havoc these bodies might wreak would likely be limited to localized disasters - perhaps a series of Tunguska-like events producing regional devastation with falls of sand and dust, perhaps electrical craters, fires and earthquakes, but no single impact crater at all.
The devastation of a global extinction requires an encounter with
something much larger than a puny comet or asteroid. In all likelihood, it requires electrical exchanges with a body the size of a planet or moon.
On the question of global warming, EU proponents insist that the issue has never been properly considered. Any attempt to understand
atmospheric and meteorologic phenomena on Earth or any planet is futile if one remains ignorant of the Electric Sun model. Thornhill writes in his essay "Global Warming in a Climate of Ignorance":
"Simply put, we do not understand the Sun.
And if we do not understand
the Sun we have no basis for understanding its influence on the Earth's climate.
"But there is a way to understand the Sun, if only we can step outside the traditional astrophysical assumption that gravity alone operates in space. The generation and transmission of power for electric lights involves magnetism. And unlike any campfire, the Sun manifests an
abundance of magnetic phenomena. Those phenomena suggest that the Sun is an electrical body. The magnetic field of the solar wind shows that electric currents flow within the solar system. The million-degree
temperature of the solar corona points to an external power source for the Sun. The polar plume and equatorial plasma torus show that the Sun, like all stars, is the focus of galactic currents 'pinching' naturally into an hourglass form with an equatorial current sheet."
Tags: make fantasy art 93 what does calling the quarter communion bread recipe church of god rites of spring mp3 black magic spells rituals black magic spells love
